Thousands of women have joined the lawsuit against Yaz, alleging that Yaz caused serious side effects including gallbladder damage and blood clots. Blood clots are serious health problems that can lead to heart attacks, strokes, pulmonary embolism, and even death.

Yaz, and other newer generation oral contraceptives that contain the hormone drospirenone such as Bayer’s Yasmin and generic varieties, were the subject of an FDA review last month based on new studies that suggested the pills put users at greater risk for blood clots than birth control pills made with other hormones. The committee fell short of recommending the drug’s withdrawal, opting instead to put stronger warnings on the pills’ packages.

Bayer’s attorneys have challenged Kessler’s expert witness credentials before in this MDL, and plan to do so again before the case goes to court.

There should be plenty of time for both sides to work on their cases. Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge David Herndon postponed the Yaz MDL’s bellwether trial. It was to have begun this month but was pushed back to April 20, 2012.

Source: Reuters

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Yaz lawyers oppose former FDA chief’s testimony

The study, released last month, puts the blood clot risk with drospirenone-containing pills at 43 to 65 percent greater when compared to pills with other types of hormones. The latest study is based on data from 330,000 Israeli women.

Previous research, involving 835,826 women ranging in age from 10 to 55 who were taking pills like Yaz, suggested the blood clot risk was as much as 74 percent greater with drospirenone pills compared to oral contraceptives containing older hormones.

All birth control pills carry a risk for blood clots, but the latest study provides more evidence that pills like Bayer’s Yaz and Yasmin may be even more dangerous. Blood clots can lead to serious complications such as strokes, heart attacks and even death. The pills have also been associated with gallbladder damage.

Other pills that contain drospirenone include Bayer’s Beyaz and Safyral. There are also numerous generic versions available.

Tens of thousands of lawsuits have been filed by women who say they have suffered serious injuries from the pills, and who say Bayer did not adequately warn them that using the pills could put their lives at risk.

A Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee recently recommended that stronger warnings be placed on the packages of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone.

Source: Beasley Allen Personal Injury Attorney

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › New studies show increased risk of blood clots with Yaz

About 7,000 lawsuits have been filed against Bayer by women or their family members who allege that they were not warned by Bayer that company’s birth control pills Yaz and Yasmin could put them at serious risk of life-threatening blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, and gallbladder damage. More plaintiffs are joining the lawsuit and some estimate that there could be as many as 14,000 plaintiffs in all.

While the documents are stored at a St. Louis-based law firm and are managed by one attorney with a full-time IT employee for technical support, firms across the country are helping review the documents and can access the database remotely. To date, about 150 attorneys have been trained how to use the data base, and up to 50 people review the documents as much as five days a week.

The paperwork not only includes documents related to Bayer’s Yaz and Yasmin, but also to generic versions of the drugs, including Ocella and Gianvi.

The first bellwether case trial is set for September. Aside from the federal litigation in southern Illinois, consolidated lawsuits are pending in Pennsylvania, California and New Jersey state courts.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Bayer generates millions of pages for Yaz, Yasmin lawsuits

Carole Ann wasn’t the only woman swayed by the playful advertisements – Yaz soon became the best selling birth control pill in the nation. However, Carole Ann found out the hard way that women like her were being fooled by Bayer Healthcare, the makers of Yaz. She suffered a blood clot in her lungs, known as a pulmonary embolism.

Soon after the ads began, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) slapped Bayer Healthcare with heavy fines and ordered the company to run a series of retraction ads that clearly stated the benefits of the pills as well as the risks involved.

“You may have seen some Yaz commercials recently that were not clear,” the revised ads say. “The FDA wants us to correct a few points in those ads.” Those corrections specify that the pills are not approved to tackle symptoms of PMS, but rather premenstrual dysphoric disorder, or PMDD, a condition with severe emotional and physical premenstrual symptoms. The ads also more clearly reported serious side effects, including blood clot conditions such as pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, heart attacks, stroke, and gallbladder damage.

The revision ads came too late for Carole Ann. She took the pills and suffered a life-threatening blood clot in her lungs. Carole Ann is one of thousands of women in the United States and Canada who has filed a lawsuit against Bayer Healthcare alleging that the pharmaceutical company did not adequately warn her of the dangers of taking the pill. She claims she would not have taken the pill had she known of the dangers. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages including economic damages, economic damages and medical expenses, attorney’s fees, costs and other relief.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › NJ woman files lawsuit against makers of Yaz birth control

Bayer faces more than 3,000 lawsuits claiming the company’s blockbuster birth control pills caused serious side effects, including strokes, heart attacks, gallbladder problems and even death.

In August, Bayer filed a protective injunction to keep plaintiffs from looking into the company’s marketing strategies for Natazia, a new birth control pill by Bayer that combines the same diuretic as in Yaz and Yasmin, drospirenone, with a different hormone, ethinyl estradiol. Plaintiffs’ attorneys fired back with a motion to include the redaction rules and remove the protective order for Natazia. Herndon changed the redaction rule, finding that the information about other drugs could lead to discovery of admissible evidence.

“From the exhibits counsel demonstrated in open court, it was clear that the redaction complained of made the production virtually useless in too many instances,” Herndon wrote. A status conference is planned for Oct. 12.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Ruling prevents Bayer from editing documents in Yaz lawsuits

Stewart was prescribed Yaz by her gynecologist in September 2007 to treat cramps associated with her period. Yaz is marketed as a contraceptive that also treats premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), premenstrual syndrome, as well as moderate acne. It also is the only birth control pill to contain ethinyl estradiol and drospirenone, a diuretic.

In June 2008, Stewart began to feel pain in her abdomen and learned that her gallbladder was not functioning properly. Two months later her gallbladder was removed. Stewart took a short break from Yaz until April 2009, when she resumed treatment only to go off of it again when she says the pills made her feel queasy. Severe cramping a few months later led her to go back on Yaz. Within days of resuming treatment, Stewart’s lawsuit claims she began suffering severe depression and suicidal thoughts that led her to attempt suicide on two separate occasions.

Stewart’s lawsuit names Bayer, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Bayer HealthCare AG, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Bayer HealthCare Corporation, Berlex Inc., and Berlex Laboratories Inc. The plaintiff seeks unspecified damages, court costs, and attorney fees.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Woman blames Yaz for gallbladder damage, severe depression

Even the commercials for Yaz point out that it is a different type of birth control pill, specially designed to treat premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), a severe form of PMS, as well as moderate acne. Yaz is the only birth control pill to contain drospirenone, a diuretic that can increase potassium levels in the blood and lead to serious health problems such as heart attack, cardiac arrhythmias, stroke, pulmonary embolism, blood clots, kidney failure, seizures, deep vein thrombosis, gallbladder disease, hepaic adenomas and sudden death.

Nearly 30 percent of women who take oral contraceptives take Yaz or Yasmin. Bayer claims that the oral contraceptives are safe, but that women with a family history of blood clots shouldn’t take them. The company also claims that the drugs’ labels warn consumers of the possible risks.

But the women who suffered from serious adverse events after using Yaz say the warnings were not adequate enough. An attorney representing some of the women injured by Yaz says he expects the lawsuits to become part of a class-action lawsuit that could take years to litigate.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Indiana women sue makers of Yaz after suffering serious side effects

Yaz incorporates a unique progestin, drospirenone, with ethinyl estradiol, a more common ingredient used in birth control drugs. Many women who have been injured after starting a Yaz regimen allege that the drug poses a multitude of serious risks, which Bayer downplayed in its Yaz marketing campaigns.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admonished Bayer in October 2008, citing the company for “significant deviations” in its promotion of Yaz. The complaint largely centered on the understatement of the drug’s risks and the overstatement of its benefits, including the treatment of conditions for which the drug was not approved. The misleading marketing campaign is frequently cited in lawsuits brought against Bayer by former Yaz users.

Some of the most serious side effects associated with Yaz include stroke, heart arrhythmia cardiac arrest, deep vein thrombosis and other forms of blood clotting, pulmonary embolism, gallbladder disease, kidney damage or failure, and sudden death.

Judge Herndon told Southwestern Illinois’ Belleville News-Democrat that he may also conduct bellwether trials, a cluster of cases selected because they reflect the charges and allegations of the other lawsuits. The outcome of bellwether trials helps establish guidelines for other cases.

When a significant number of similar lawsuits, such as those being brought against Bayer over Yaz injuries, accumulate in federal courts, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation normally moves to consolidate them in one U.S. District Court to avoid redundant efforts and inconsistent pre-trial rulings. The dynamics of these representative trials will then be considered in the evaluation of other cases.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Southern Illinois district court to handle Yaz lawsuits

The plaintiff, who resides in Belpre, Ohio, had been taking Yaz for about a year when she developed deep vein thrombosis in her leg. She spent three days in the hospital, where like many other women who use Yaz, she was put on a regimen of blood thinners to dissolve the clot and reduce the swelling in her leg.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a very serious type of blood clot that can lead to serious complications and death if not treated properly. Clots that form a DVT can become dislodged, traveling through the bloodstream to the lungs and causing a pulmonary embolism, resulting in permanent damage to the lung. DVT can also cause stroke, cardiac arrest, and other potentially deadly conditions.

Yaz contains drospirenone, a synthetic progestin used in Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella, which is a generic form of Yasmin. Drospirenone has been shown to increase potassium levels in some women who take the drug, which can lead to DVT and affect the function of several organs, including the heart.

The Ohio plaintiff’s lawsuit was filed in New Jersey Superior Court. The suit alleges that the plaintiff’s injuries were the result of Bayer’s failure to adequately warn consumers of the drug’s risks. Her attorney claims that Bayer knew Yaz to be more dangerous than other birth-control pills, but chose to downplay the drug’s hazards.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Ohio mother sues Bayer, alleging Yaz caused blood clot

The plaintiff began taking Yaz after her gynecologist reassured her of the drug’s benefits and safety. After weeks of using Yaz, however, the woman began experiencing severe pain that sent her to the emergency room twice for general treatment and CT scans.

It took 13 hours for doctors to finally discover the problem. According to the Times, “In her left lung, the pulmonologist told her, was the largest blood clot they had ever seen and there were others in her right lung as well.”

The woman spent 6 days in the hospital as she was treated with 2 types of blood thinners to dissolve the clots in her lungs. Doctors expected a good recovery but told her that she might never be completely the same . Two weeks after the treatment, she told the Times that she is “incredibly tired most of the time.”

The plaintiff said that a couple of days after the treatment the severity of her situation suddenly hit her. “Wow, I almost died,” she told the Times. Now she strives to tell others about how Yaz affected her and has put the lives of so many other women in danger.

“It’s not just about women who are my age,” she told the Times, adding that lots of younger women are being seriously injured by the drug.

“There’s no reason for blood clots to be forming except for this pill and it’s a very scary situation,” she said.

Bayer has defended itself and Yaz against the allegations, pointing to the two Bayer-funded studies that showed the drug had a safety profile similar to other, more traditional oral contraceptives.

Another Yaz study, not funded by Bayer, found women who took Yaz to be more at risk for blood clots, heart attacks, and strokes. Those results were echoed by a more recent study published by the British Medical Journal in August.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Recovering Maryland woman sues Bayer after Yaz nearly killed her

“She was short of breath. She was having severe chest pains and her face was changing colors,” Kraus told WTAE.

“She ended up going into cardiac arrest three times. One time it took 10 minutes to revive her. They eventually had to do emergency surgeries because they noticed there were two huge blood clots, one in each pulmonary artery,” Kraus said.

Kraus said that because of Yaz, her daughter now faces possibly lifelong struggles with pancreatitis, liver function problems, and acute kidney failure. Kraus and the other plaintiffs have requested a jury trial, more than $150,000 in compensation, attorney fees, court costs, and punitive damages.

Bayer Corporation, which is headquartered in Pittsburgh, defended itself from the allegations in a statement to WTAE.

“The complaints we have reviewed so far pertain to side effects that are warned about in the labeling of all contraceptives. Bayer will defend itself vigorously against these lawsuits,” a company spokesman said.

The lawsuit, however, alleges that Bayer grossly downplayed the risks of Yaz in its advertising campaigns and that the number of adverse events caused by Yaz is at least 10 times more than the number reported incidents, possibly 100 times more.

“I just don’t want anybody else to see their child go through anything like this ever again,” Kraus told WTAE.

Source: http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Mother says Yaz nearly killed her daughter

When customers go to Google’s search engine and perform a search for information on Yaz or “the pill,” they will see this simple new ad format appear in the search results. Some sponsored links will appear at the top of the results in a yellowish box. One of the links will lead to Bayer’s website for Yaz and will contain a gray-text notice: “Click to see full safety and prescribing information, including boxed warning.”

Why is Bayer using this new format for Yaz? Because the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has warned pharmaceutical companies about using the text promos for drug advertising since they do not contain any warnings or disclaimers to customers about possible side effects, health risks, and other drawbacks.

Bayer clashed with the FDA last year over its Yaz advertisements. The company aired a couple of television commercials titled “Not Gonna Take It” and “Balloons” that promoted the drug for unapproved uses, downplayed its risks and side effects, and used competing music and visual to draw the viewer’s attention away from the safety information. The FDA ordered the ads off the air and requested that Bayer spend a minimum of $20 million on a “corrective” ad campaign.

Other drug companies, anxious to promote their drugs through Google’s sponsored links without being called out by the FDA, will no doubt keep a watchful eye on the agency’s reaction to the new Yaz links.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Bayer tests Google’s new ad format for Yaz promotion

Development of gall stones and gall bladder disease are among the serious risks associated with the oral contraceptive Yaz. The drug has also been blamed for elevating the risk of cardiac arrhythmias and heart attack, stroke, pulmonary embolism, blood clots, kidney failure, seizures, deep vein thrombosis, hepatic adenomas and sudden death.

According to the lawsuit, 50 deaths attributed to the use of Yaz and Yasmin were reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration between the first quarter of 2004 and the third quarter of 2008.

The lawsuit alleges that Bayer markets Yaz and Yasmin “as providing the same efficacy as other birth control pills in preventing pregnancy, but with additional benefits,” rather than the higher risks the drugs pose.

“The foreseeable risks of the product exceeded the benefits associated with its design or formulation. Or they were more dangerous than an ordinary consumer would expect,” the lawsuit states.

The plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages, medical expenses and economic damages, and attorney’s fees. Because Bayer ran a deceptive ad campaign for Yaz, hailing the drug for uses unapproved by the FDA while downplaying its risks, the plaintiff also seeks an unspecified amount of punitive damages.

Source: http://www.chicagonow.com/

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Chicago woman sues Bayer over Yaz-related injuries

“Even though I’m old, I don’t want the horrifying side effects of aging to prevent me from doing what I love,” Haskins, who just turned 30, jokes. “I want to walk with canoes, peel oranges, play fetch with my pup, and do stuff with horses,” she says while a montage of images pulled from actual television drug ads plays. In one of the ads Haskins shows, anatomy takes the form of bouncing water balloons; in another, people are made of pipes. After all, cute, cartoon-like illustrations help lighten ads for drugs that pose very serious side effects for some people.

Amusing as Haskins’ Target episode is, it effectively illustrates just how outlandish and just plain silly some pharmaceutical advertising can be.

It’s also not the first time that Haskins has featured drug commercials on Target: Women. Last year, she spoofed big pharma television ads for birth control drugs, noting how they are touted as a way to have fewer periods more than anything else.

“Fewer periods! Yay! Now we don’t have to leave the tribe and go sit in that hut for a week. That was a bummer,” Haskins says.

Drugs developed for one thing but marketed as a treatment for something else is a common ruse employed by some pharmaceutical companies to make their products more enticing. Negative disclosures about the drugs, such as the legally required information about side effects, may be washed out with distracting music and visuals. That was how Bayer advertised Yaz last year, before the Food and Drug Administration cited the company for false and misleading advertising and ordered a redo.

“You may have seen some Yaz commercials recently that were not clear. The FDA wants us to correct a few points in those ads,” the presenter in the revised commercial says.

The Yaz advertisements spawned a number of video skits lampooning the drugmaker’s claims and the style in which they are presented: a group of girlfriends in a lively bar discussing side effects in a way that would never happen in real life. One woman, who says she “didn’t go to med school for nothing,” gives her friends an off the cuff and very clinical rundown of the drug’s risks while her friends listen intently.

Inserting herself into this scenario, Haskins asks “Does anyone think Stephanie is acting super weird right now?”

For all the risks attached to some blockbuster drugs, it’s good to see that the absurdity of drug advertising isn’t sliding by unnoticed.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Comedian lampoons the absurdity of drug ads

The plaintiff claims that at the time, she was not aware the FDA had not approved Yaz for the treatment of skin conditions. In an extensive and aggressive marketing campaign, Bayer touted its birth control drug as an effective treatment for acne and symptoms associated with Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) – conditions for which the FDA never tested or approved Yaz.

In October 2008, FDA officials warned Bayer that its Yaz ads intentionally mislead and confused viewers by overstating the drug’s effectiveness, overselling its benefits, and not adequately communicating the drug’s potential for serious side effects, including blood clots, cardiac arrest, and gallbladder disease. According to the FDA, the commercials used distracting visuals, multiple scene changes, and background music that effectively interfered with the audio presentation about the serious risks associated with the drug.

“Bayer promoted Yaz with the slogan ‘the difference a little chemistry can make,’” the plaintiff said. “What Bayer did not disclose was how negative that difference can be. Yaz gave me life-threatening injuries that have forever altered my life.”

After several months of Yaz therapy, the plaintiff developed an acute pain in her left shoulder and had difficulty breathing. A visit to the doctor revealed the plaintiff had developed blood clots in both her lungs. She was hospitalized immediately and treated successfully, but just one month later she developed gallstones and had to undergo surgery for their removal.

The plaintiff alleges that she “suffered months of anxiety and nausea related to (the) medical procedures and drugs given to treat the adverse side effects (she) developed from taking Yaz.”

The complaint charges that had Bayer properly warned patients about the dangers of using Yaz strictly as an acne treatment, the plaintiff could have avoided serious injury.

The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, where Bayer’s American operations are based. The plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Injured by Yaz, SC nurse files lawsuit against Bayer

Pulmonary embolisms are blockages in one of the arteries leading to the lungs formed by a substance that has migrated through the bloodstream from another part of the body, commonly the legs. Clinical studies of Yaz conducted in Denmark and the Netherlands suggest a link between the Yaz ingredient drosperinone and a higher occurrence of blood clots than in women who took traditional contraceptives containing levonorgestrel.

A spokesperson for Bayer said that the company is cooperating with the investigation, but that it stood by the safety of its drug.

“A singular case, as tragic and sad as it is, does not indicate an increased risk for the whole group of women who take the pill,” Oliver Renner, a Bayer spokesman, told Bloomberg. “Studies have shown that the risk isn’t higher for Yaz than for other oral contraceptives.”

Of course, Bayer’s spokesperson dismisses the results of the two independent clinical trials and focuses on the more favorable outcome the Bayer-funded clinical test, which suggested the risks of Yaz were similar to those of traditional birth control therapies.

As the top selling oral contraceptive in the world, Yaz is big business for Bayer. The drug brought in $1.86 billion just in the first quarter of 2009.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Switzerland investigates the death of young Yaz user

The New York Times recently published a report about the dangers frequently associated with Yaz and other oral contraceptives. The article observes that one Bayer-sponsored European study involving tens of thousands of women found no difference in the level of cardiovascular problems or death between women taking Yaz and women who took levonorgestrel, a much older progestin-based drug.

However, the results of two other studies conducted in Denmark and the Netherlands and published in the British Medical Journal last month, showed that women who took Yaz and other newer progestins had a higher risk of blood clots, which can adversely affect the heart.

One doctor quoted in the New York Times report theorized that Yaz and other newer forms of birth control may have a different affect in European populations versus the more racially diverse and genetically mixed American population.

However, Dr. Frits Rosendaal, a clinical epidemiologist at Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands, told the New York Times that patients taking Yaz should switch to birth control drugs containing levonorgestrel. “Even if the risk of thrombosis is low, why not choose the lowest risk, just in case?” he told the New York Times.

Both Bayer and the FDA are conducting ongoing studies designed to measure the safety risks of Yaz and Yasmin against drugs that do not contain drospirenone.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Yaz health risks: better safe than sorry?

Earlier this year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration sent a letter to Bayer Healthcare questioning the company’s ability to handle active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) testing. Bayer acknowledged the FDA’s concerns in an April response to the agency, but said that it had analyzed all relevant batches using its own testing standards and found that the quality of the U.S.-bound drugs was unaffected. Bayer stood by its quality control methods publicly as well.

Last month, the FDA sent another letter to Bayer, warning the company about “significant deviations” in its testing of key Yaz ingredients. “Your firm concluded that these … results were within the accepted variation of the analytical method and that the quality of these batches was not affected,” the FDA letter stated. “We disagree with your rationale and conclusion. An assay test is used to determine potency, not method variability.”

Rose Talarico, a spokeswoman for Bayer, told Reuters that the company was preparing a response to the FDA. “Based on our assessment at this point in time, we have identified no safety and efficacy impact on our products in relation to the [good manufacturing practice] issues as cited by the FDA,” she said.

The FDA warning to Bayer concerning its API testing wasn’t the first time the agency has found the company in violation of federal regulations. Last October, the FDA cited Bayer for false and misleading television advertisements that promoted Yaz for conditions for which it wasn’t approved, exaggerated its effectiveness, and downplayed the risks associated with the drug. FDA pressure prompted Bayer to launch another American ad campaign correcting the misrepresentations of the earlier ads.

Michael A. Santoro, an associate professor of ethics at the Rutgers Business School who studies pharmaceutical industry ethics, told the New York Times that the FDA warnings about quality control and advertising raise a red flag about Bayer’s attitude in complying with federal regulations. Santoro said that drug manufacturers ought to set higher standards for themselves than those established by the federal government.

“It tells me that [Bayer] is not understanding the business that it is in, that it is not understanding the health risks that it is posing to the public or the financial risk that it is creating for its shareholders,” Santoro told the New York Times.

His concerns seems to be bolstered by the growing number of Yaz lawsuits filed against Bayer in the U.S., which currently stand at 74. Some of the lawsuits have been filed by women allegedly harmed by Yaz who claim they were drawn to the drug because of Bayer’s misleading direct-to-consumer television ads.

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Yaz testing and marketing raises ethical red flag

All of the lawsuits allege that Yaz and Yasmin caused adverse events attributable to the ingredient drospirenone (DRSP), which has been linked to blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, gall bladder disease, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other serious reactions, including sudden death. The suits assert that Bayer knew about the risks but failed to disclose them to consumers while at the same time aggressively marketing the drug.

Last year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warned Bayer that its television advertisements for Yaz were misleading and failed to disclose all of the drug’s risks.

Traditional birth control drugs do not contain DRSP, which is a new type of progestin that influences the body’s natural ability to balance salt and water, which could adversely lead to elevated potassium levels. Excessive potassium levels in the body may trigger fatal cardiac arrhythmia and other serious health problems.

The FDA received more than 50 reports of deaths linked to Yaz and Yasmin between 2004 and 2008. The fatalities involved heart attacks, pulmonary embolisms, and strokes. Excessive blood potassium levels were found in many of the cases.

A U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has scheduled a hearing for September 24 to decide if the Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits currently pending in federal courts are similar enough to be consolidated into an MDL (multi-district litigation).

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Yaz lawsuits consolidated in Pennsylvania

The “deviations,” as the FDA called them, were cited in a letter dated September 9th and sent to Dr. Franz-Josef Renneke, the Site Manager of Bayer’s plant in Bergkamen, Germany. The FDA published the letter on its website this week.

The FDA found that Bayer tested the quality of some drug ingredients, including drospirenone, a main ingredient in Yaz, using a method the U.S. does not accept. The method involves averaging a group of several samples, rather than providing test results for each ingredient batch. The U.S. requires foreign pharmaceutical manufacturers to conform to American standards when testing the quality of its U.S.-bound exports.

Earlier this year, the FDA warned Bayer that it exported ingredients to the U.S. between 2007 and 2009 yet failed to test them using U.S.-approved methods. Bayer responded in April that it had analyzed all relevant batches and concluded that their quality “was not affected.”

That’s beside the point, the FDA’s letter last week said.

“Your firm concluded that these … results were within the accepted variation of the analytical method and that the quality of these batches was not affected,” the FDA letter stated. “We disagree with your rationale and conclusion. An assay test is used to determine potency, not method variability.”

Yaz and Yasmin were Bayer HealthCare’s best-selling drugs last year, with sales reaching $1.8 billion worldwide.

The FDA has not discovered quality problems in the German imports and does not advise consumers taking Yaz to stop. The FDA’s warning is meant to prevent quality problems from occurring in the future.

According to the Associated Press, “The FDA regularly issues warning letters to companies that do not follow regulations for manufacturing and marketing. The letters are not legally binding, but the agency can take companies to court if they are ignored.”

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Yaz ingredient not properly tested, FDA warns Bayer

Yaz is a combination birth control pill containing drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol. It is marketed not only as a contraceptive pill, but as a treatment for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), a condition with severe emotional and physical premenstrual symptoms, and as an effective treatment for moderate acne.

However, the FDA says the original television commercial implied Yaz could also treat Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) and that it would keep a woman’s skin clear and/or treat more severe acne. Worse than this, the FDA says the commercials used distracting visuals, numerous scene changes, and competing background music that interfered with the audio presentation of the serious risks associated with the product.

“This is particularly troubling as some of the risks being conveyed are serious, even life-threatening,” the FDA letter states. The overall effect of the distractions adds up to “undermine the communication of important risk information, minimizing these risks and misleadingly suggesting that YAZ is safer than has been demonstrated by substantial evidence or substantial clinical experience.”

As a result of the FDA’s findings, the attorneys general of 27 states joined the federal agency in cracking down on misleading consumer advertising, and Bayer was required to create new ads to more clearly communicate the benefits and risks of its product, at a cost of $20 million.

But don’t feel too sorry for Bayer yet. Yaz is the best-selling oral contraceptive product in the United States, with sales in 2008 topping $600 million.

In the new campaign, a young woman seriously addresses the camera, while reminding viewers that they may have heard of Yaz on previous commercials, but that she’s here because “the FDA wants us to correct a few points in those ads.”

Source: New York Times

SOURCE: Yaz Lawsuit › Bayer creates new ad campaign for Yaz after FDA crackdown